|
What's new on the West Coast
The Search for the Magic Driver (Part 5)
Copyright 2002 by Leith Anderson
All rights reserved
Originally appeared in December 2002 issue of Golf
Today
By Leith Anderson
The Winner and New Champion - SMT
Shinnecock
"Mr. Shinny" didn't do it all by himself
(he got a little help from his cousin, Mr. Orange) but
there's a new Magic Driver in the bag. It was a dogfight
this month. Read on for the details. To make the story
more meaningful, a little background is necessary.
The Death of the Clone and Knock-Off
There was a time when a few Big Names ruled the golf
world. If you were a "Player" years ago you
loved Wilson or Hogan or MacGregor. The Big Three were
expensive to buy and usually sold only by Green Grass
golf professionals. Later, Ping and then Callaway entered
the contest with great success. High prices always motivate
golfers to search for alternatives and that's when the
"clone" and "knock-off" business
took off. If you wanted a set of clubs that cost about
half what the name brands were selling for, you found
yourself a clubmaker and he could build a set that looked
a lot like one of the name brands. But you still couldn't
show up to play at the Olympic Club with clones in your
bag.
And then things changed. The Name Brand Companies began
protecting their designs with copyrights. It became
more and more difficult for copycats to produce clubs
that were too close to the name brands. Lawsuits flew
around and copycat companies went out of business.
And there were quality issues. As the golf component
business moved more and more to Taiwan and then mainland
China the quality sometimes came down with the prices.
Lots of products were returned because they failed in
play. These factors lead to the rise of a whole new
class of entrepreneur. Ambitious small-time businessmen
found their way to China and started businesses based
on original clubhead designs and high quality standards.
Top design and performance no longer was the domain
of the Big Guys.
Today there are no really successful companies left
that are ripping off original designs. The next wave
in the custom golf component business is original products
that, at a minimum, are totally competitive with the
best from Titleist, Ping, Callaway, Taylormade or Hogan.
Mainland China - the new center of
the Golf Universe.
It won't be long before almost all golf club heads,
shafts and grips will be made in Mainland China. It's
hard to imagine a Chinese worker welding dozens of Titanium
driver heads a day with each one worth a year's wages
in China.
But China has been "open" for years. First,
the multinational golf OEM companies sourced their components
there. Then came Golfsmith, Golfworks, Dynacraft and
others serving the custom clubmaking industry. Along
the way a few Americans with Chinese heritage began
to import heads to distribute in America. Today, importing
from China doesn't take multinational power or an ethnic
heritage. Plain old Americans can take their original
ideas to China and return with a product that performs
in the American market.
Mike Tait (SMT) and Steve Almo (Bang
Golf)
The two companies that have emerged as the leaders
in originality are Bang and SMT. Bang is the brainchild
of Steve Almo and SMT came from the imagination of Mike
Tait.
At some point in the future it will be interesting
to discuss Bang Golf in more detail as well as Infiniti,
Zero Tolerance, Integra and Kent Sports. But for today,
I'm going to focus on SMT. SMT stands for "Superior
Metal Technology".
Mike Tait has been in the golf industry for many years.
He's a former golf pro who made a living distributing
Chinese components to the American clubmaking community.
In the last few years, a new category emerged. It is
the "Long Drive Tour". It turns out that the
"Long Drivers" are the ultimate supporters
of the golf component industry. By definition, any competitor
in the Long Drive business cannot possibly use "off
the shelf" clubs. They are subjecting their equipment
to abuse that an average golfer cannot even imagine.
Shafts are 50 inches and these athletes can destroy
a clubhead with a few swings.
That is what got Mike into his own company. He was
importing Chinese titanium driver heads and began to
notice he was replacing as many as he was selling in
a bad month. The long drive contestants were simply
crushing anything the touched. He resolved to start
a company that made a product that would withstand the
demands of the Long Drive Professionals. In addition
to creating original designs, he subjected each head
to "cannon testing" - blasting each one at
least 100 balls at speeds exceeding the 140+ MPH swingspeeds
that it takes to be competitive. The result was an almost
instant success. He captured the hearts and minds of
the golf "techno freaks" who hang out on the
Golf Equipment Aficionado's Forum on Delphi. (BTW: If
you're interested in golf equipment, the GEA is a great
forum.)
The next step was to capture the hearts and minds of
the Long Drivers. SMT did that at the "Nationals"
that were completed in early November at Mesquite, Nevada.
SMT won the open division with its bright red "450
Deep Bore" head (on an Accuflex shaft), and the
senior division with its Purple "Nemisis"
model. These new designs are successors to the Shinnecock,
arguably the most successful long drive head in the
last year. So that's my lead in for the next part of
the story, a contest between "Mr. Red" and
"Mr. Purple" and "Mr. Shinny" to
unseat the current Magic Driver, my old friend the Nicklaus
Air Max 360.
The Battlefield - Pasatiempo
It was convenient that my friend Brian invited me down
to Pasatiempo on November 9th for a friendly round with
another Oracle veteran, Dan, a.k.a, "The Doctor".
The rains had subsided the day before but the course
was still as soggy as a wet sponge. Brian had a bad
back that day so he decided we should play the white
tees. It was, absolutely, the longest 6100 course in
the world. But it was perfect for a contest between
"Mr. Red" and "Mr. Purple".
Mr. Red came out of the bag on the second hole. This
was literally the first swing for the driver that I
built the night before with an Apache 58+ shaft flexed
at 6.0 on the PCS Equalizer System. I even cheated a
little bit and made the club 46" - talking a page
out of the Long Drive Bible. The online forums all suggest
a long, smooth swing on an inside to out and upward
path. Perfect swing, solid contact and (gasp!!) a drive
that seemed to stay in the air for ten seconds. If you
have played Pasatiempo, you know that the second hold
is a long, difficult par four. I was in the middle of
the fairway with a nine iron into the green. As many
times as I have played "Pasa" the only drive
I remember that was farther was in the middle of the
summer when the fairways were hard. There is only one
way to say it, this was a B-O-M-B.
After a very long fade on the fourth and a dead straight
bullet on the sixth, the Doctor asked if he could try
Mr. Red. He hit a "pop up" that sailed past
a solid shot with his own custom fit Callaway Biggest
Bertha on the ninth. From that point on, the Doctor
and I were hitting several drives with Mr. Red on most
holes. (You can do that on Pasatiempo and still finish
a round in four hours.)
Without boring you with every detail, Mr. Red also
gave up a career best on the tenth hole. With the round
complete, it looked like a hands-down victory for Mr.
Red. It was so much fun that we really didn't give Mr.
Purple a fair shake. Shinny didn't even make the trip.
Confirming the Results (or not!!)
I went back to the shop that afternoon and fired up
the Distance Caddy to confirm my perceptions. Over the
years, I have been fooled many times by a club that
seemed to be performing but found the honeymoon was
very short. I had a little nagging doubt in the back
of my mind. On a couple of holes at Pasa, everything
felt right but when I got to the ball, I was disappointed
that it wasn't a little farther.
The Distance Caddy is a very useful tool for fitting
clubs. When connected to a personal computer, it records
the carry distance, clubhead speed, ball speed, and
a statistic called "efficiency". Efficiency
is a calculation based on the energy transfer between
the clubhead and the ball and provides a shorthand indication
of how solid the shot was. The DC Wiz Fit software lets
you test four clubs side by side and compare the individual
shot statistics and the averages. Over the last few
months, I have found the comparative statistics to be
very reliable.
My swing speed tests out at 105 MPH, plus or minus.
Distance Caddy measurements show that a 105 swingspeed
will deliver a 225-235 carry distance, a ball speed
off the face in the low to mid 140's at normal efficiency
ratings. Another way to figure the relationship is through
the ratio of ball speed divided by clubhead speed. A
ball speed of 130 divided by a clubhead speed of 100
yields a ratio of 1.3. The ball is coming off the face
at 1.3 times clubhead speed. If you know your ball speed,
you can work to achieve the proper launch angle and
spin rate to reach maximum distance. Launch monitors
like the Swing Dynamics machine focus on this ratio.
Experience shows that ratios in the 1.4 range are very
good and 1.5+ are excellent. Very few amateurs exceed
the high 1.4 range. Understanding numbers and relationships
like this make "reasonable expectations" very
clear. Physics will tell you how far you can expect
a ball to travel. You can't defy the Laws of Nature.
When I tested Mr. Red on the Distance Caddy, some very
disturbing numbers came up. I was getting higher than
normal clubhead speed, well north of 105, which I attributed
to the extra length of the club. The carry distance
was a few yards farther than normal. However, the balls
peed just barely got into the 140's, which was much
too low. I began to suspect that the Apache 58+ shaft
was too weak. I couldn't think of any other reason that
the high swingspeed was not getting into the ball.
This suspicion was supported by the numbers that were
coming in from Mr. Purple, shafted up with an Apache
65P at 45" and flexed to a PCS Equalizer standard
6.5. The DC showed that Mr. Purple was producing ball
speeds in the high 140's with a normal swingspeed. Mr.
Purple's efficiency numbers were much better as well,
indicating more solid contact. Indoor distances were
about equal.
Day Two - The Honeymoon is Over
Sunday November tenth I had another low-key round scheduled
with my friend Todd, a giant of a golfer at 6' 10"
who was playing his first round with a set of Apache
40+ shafted graphite irons at 2" over length. I
wanted to be there to pick up the splinters.
I had Mr. Red in the bag looking for a repeat of the
day before. It was a chilly day with a blustery wind
and intermittent rain. I won't bore you with failure,
but I never hit a solid drive with Mr. Red. Maybe I
was stiff, maybe cold, maybe the club was too long.
I don't know exactly what the problem was but Mr. Red
went back in the trunk after the first nine. Luckily,
the Nicklaus driver was still in the car and I salvaged
the back nine.
Back to the Lab
I spent the next several hours at the Golf Lab testing
Mr. Red, Mr. Purple and the trusty old Shinnecock that
had been waiting for a shot. The head styles are very
different. Mr. Red looks like a "brick on a stick".
It looks surprisingly small for its 450 cc size. Even
though Mr. Red bombed out of this competition early,
I'm not totally ready to give up on the large driver
heads. There is simply too much evidence on the online
forums that very large drivers deliver better distance
and consistency. I think that my trouble came from the
requirement to swing somewhat differently with a longer
shaft. I also have to find the right shaft.
Mr. Purple is a striking clubhead, both color, the
polished face with no scorelines, and the shape which
is out of the pear-shaped tradition, but still radical.
When shafted with an Apache 65P, it looked like a winner
and seemed to show that with indoor testing. Mr. Purple
fell out of the race when we went to the range. Despite
building the club to a much softer frequency, a PCS
6.0, the club still played much too stiff. This was
compounded by the relatively low loft of Mr. Purple's
head (8*). The ballflight was simply too low and misses
went low and to the right. It took about ten shots to
confirm that Mr. Purple was good in the net, but couldn't
take it to the course.
Luckily, Mr. Shinny was tested out and ready to go.
The indoor numbers were very close to Mr. Purple and
both had beat out the Magic Nicklaus in swingspeed and
ball speed tests on the Distance Caddy. Also, The Shinnecock
was a 10* loft shafted with a 65N at 45" flexed
to a PCS Equalizer 6.0. The ultimate test was ball flight
and shot shape. I had grown too accustomed to working
the Nicklaus "both ways" and loved the consistency.
A couple of range sessions confirmed that the Shinny
won a place in the bag for at least the next month.
The driver was hot, launch angle perfect and the natural
draw could be turned into a fade.
Conclusions from the November "Search"
Finding the correct shaft flex profile is a problem.
The newer shafts are touting "high bend point"
and some kind of "tip stiff" characteristics.
I think they are just too demanding for most players
to hit. For example, the 65 P from Apache which is gaining
a following on the PGA Tour after K.J. Choi used it
to win two tournaments is too difficult for my 105 MPH
swingspeed even at flexes much softer than normal. I
haven't found a flex soft enough to work with the 65
P.
On the other hand, the Apache 65 N which is described
as a mid bend point shaft and aimed at amateurs is a
good performer, although it still plays very stiff.
I think it is important to dial down flex with the newer
shafts. This is especially true when the shafts have
been PUREd.
Ultralight shafts might contribute to distance problems
for golfers with higher swing speeds. My experience
this month with the Apache 58+ makes me wonder if there
is enough "backbone" in the ultralight shafts
to transfer power from faster swings. More testing will
be required, but I'm thinking that if you're going to
use an ultralight shaft, it might be necessary to step
up to a much stiffer flex.
Loft is your friend. Most golfers tend to make the
"macho" choice and buy drivers with 8 or 9
degrees of loft. Depending on the head style, this is
likely to be too little. Mr. Purple was an 8* head.
I couldn't get a decent trajectory. I think it would
take at least a 10* Nemesis to be playable for a good
amateur. The Shinnecock was 10* and it produced a trajectory
that I would have guessed to be 8*. It also takes a
higher loft to be able to work the ball both ways. This
shows one more time that you've simply got to take a
driver you're thinking of buying to the range to see
the ball flight outdoors.
The "Power Plug" is still performing. We
have about 30 players who have installed them in their
drivers with 100% satisfaction. Reports are that the
counterweight delivers a little more consistency and
an average of ten yards more distance. This may be a
trend, I heard from an inside source recently that Apache
is working on a backweighted shaft. Interesting. As
for irons, we're still testing. I have plugs installed
in my irons but I'm still tinkering to find the correct
weight.
"Mr.Shinny" is going to the course this month.
There are a couple of tournaments so we'll see how he
does under pressure. I'll let you know.
Leith Anderson
Clubmaker and Clubfitter
Golf Lab, Palo Alto, CA.
He can be reached by email: Leith@calgolftech.com
Or by phone (650) 743-2816. |